Power-Law Parameter Estimation

The basic structure and dynamics of the ionosphere are captured by deterministic models.  At the next level, physics-based ionospheric simulations produce stochastic structure, which is characterized by a statistical model.  Statistical models characterize an ensemble of realizations that support well-defined average measures, such as means, higher moments, probability density functions, and covariance.  Such models require statistical uniformity, whereas real processes not strictly homogeneous.

Analyzing real diagnostic data requires segmentation and averaging.  The length of the segment and the sample interval determine the scale or frequency measurement range.  Selecting a segmentation requires and assessment of the largest scale that supports statistical substructure.  In our 2014 paper Wavelet-based analysis and power law classification of C/NOFS high-resolution electron density data, REF wavelets were introduced because of their ability to measure the variation of the scale over as many scale replications supported by the interval.  Scale spectra measure scale versus distance, and thereby provide scale measures and scale dependent uniformity.  A classification procedure was then developed to estimate two-component power-law parameters.

In a second study the classification procedure was applied to C/NOFS data accumulated over a four-year period REF.  It was found that the most highly disturbed passes supported two-component power-law, giving way to a single power-law at smaller disturbance levels.  All the classified SDFs showed a correlation between the turbulent strength and the large-scale spectral index.  It had also been noted that the correlation was observed in remote diagnostics as well.

Because of the persistence of the correlation between the turbulent strength and the large-scale power-law index and some published papers discovered in development of Maximum Likelihood IPE, we began to suspect that the correlation was intrinsic to power-law parameter estimation.  A detailed study, which has been submitted for publication, REF, show that this was indeed the case.

It was shown further that wavelet-based estimators exaggerate the correlation.  The ramifications for the C/NOFS results change mainly the interpretation.  The correlation is intrinsic power-law measurements, not a property of the underlying structure.  Regarding wavelets, we believe they are useful for identifying segmentation, but should not be used in place of periodograms for IPE.

About Chuck

Retired research engineer. Recently published book "The Theory of Scintillation with Applications in Remote Sensing," John Wiley IEEE Press, 201
This entry was posted in New Results. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Power-Law Parameter Estimation

  1. Fantastic web site. A lot of helpful information here. I am sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And certainly, thank you on your sweat!

  2. Hi, I doo think this is a great blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I may return once again since I saved as
    a favorite it. Money and freedom is the best
    way to change, may you be rich and contine to guikde
    other people.

  3. Klaudia says:

    This site was… hhоw ddo you say іt? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something that helpеd me.
    Many thanks!

  4. Evеryone loves what you gᥙhys are uρ toⲟ.
    Such clever work and coverage! Keep up the very good works guys I’ve
    you guys to bⅼօgroll.

  5. Ꮋmm it seems like yoᥙr website ate my first commеnt (it was extremely long)
    so I guess I’ⅼl just sum it up what Ihad written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying ʏour blog.

    I tooo am an asppirіng blog blogger Ƅut I’m still nnew to everything.
    Do yοu have any helpful hints for newbie blog writеrs?
    I’d reаlⅼy appreciqte it.

  6. I am aϲtually thankful to the ownner of tһіs website who has shared this impressive pparagraph at at this

  7. What’s up, I ѡould like to subscribe for this weblog to get most up-to-date updаteѕ, therefore ԝhere can i do it please help out.

  8. Hi there, its nice paragraph concerning media print, we all be
    aware of media is a fantastic source of facts.

  9. It’s amazing in favor of me to have a site, which is good in favor
    of my knowledge. thanks admin

  10. Ermelinda says:

    You made some good points there. I checked on the net for more information about the issue
    and found most people will go along with your views on this website.

  11. Bo Wilde says:

    Hello there! This blog post couldn’t be written any better!Going through this article reminds me of my previous roommate!He continually kept talking about this. I’ll forward thisinformation to him. Fairly certain he’s going tohave a very good read. Thank you for sharing!

  12. you are in point of fact a just right webmaster. The site loading pace
    is amazing. It seems that you are doing any distinctive
    trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed
    a excellent process on this matter!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *